The strong get stronger (and the weak get weaker), so the saying goes and this is often one of the keys to deciding which markets to invest in when utilising charts.
In our view one of the problems with technology these days is that it's ubiquitous, whereas 20 years ago the average retail trader didn't have access to a computer or at least one with any real power or ease of use.
So today with all the number crunching in the markets by anyone with a £300+ computer it may actually defeat the purpose simply because there's no edge anymore. Back in the old days people who used charts drew and updated them by hand and therefore the shape of the chart was usually far more important than anything else. But now the shape of the chart or 'what does it look like' seems to have been replaced with all sorts of different mathematical formulas.
So maybe a better strategy is to chuck out the computer power and go back to basics.
In the April and May Newsletters we did some simple analysis on both the FTSE 100 and US markets suggesting that the long term trend was up and therefore further strength was to be expected. This analysis has proved to be right.
But were there any clues to suggest that the FTSE 100 was a better investment than backing Wall Street? For example, an investor might have had £10,000 to invest but couldn't choose whether to put that money to work in the UK or US stockmarkets.
Simple charting combined with relative strength held some useful clues.
What is Relative Strength?
Simply put it's looking at two related markets to see if one is outperforming the other, and if so betting that the outperforming market will continue to outperform. Relative strength is really a simple probability play. It doesn't always work but if you do enough trades the probabilities will usually rise to the surface.
Let's look at the recent FTSE 100 and US S&P 500 charts for confirmation of this