The Opportunity Cost Of NOT Being Invested In The Stockmarket
In last month's newsletter when the FTSE 100 was around 6100 I wrote an article suggesting the stockmarket might not be working correctly.
This was because a stockmarket is supposed to be a forward pricing mechanism. Therefore in my eyes, because of the current economic mess, I believe stock prices should be a lot lower, anywhere between 500 and 1000 points.
One important point to bear in mind with this article is that I'm talking about the general stockmarket and not about any specific stocks. This means if I like a certain stock (such as Mining stocks or Spurs, discussed on the following page) I will continue to buy regardless of what the overall market is doing, or is likely to do.
An Interesting Rally Develops
As soon as last month's newsletter was published stock prices enjoyed a 2-3 day rally pushing prices up to around 6375 (FTSE 100) before coming back down just as fast to stand right now around 6100.
What was the reason for this punchy rally? I think it all had to do with another set of deeply massaged US economic figures (from memory they were GDP). Now only a fool or fanatical patriot believes anything the US government publishes when it come to economic figures these days but then only another fool would bet against perception.
Yes, perception over reality normally wins in the markets. When those GDP figures were released (whether anyone believed them or not) the market's perception was that they were good and the bad times were over - therefore the bumper 3-4 day rally.
Now I don't believe for one minute that serious market participants with any clout are under any illusion that the stockmarket is a house of cards and an accident waiting to happen. But again, as long as the perception is neutral/mildly bullish they'll stop from taking any action.
But if this perception breaks down then a whole wave of selling will break out forcing more sell orders leading to far lower stock prices. This is what I think is coming, but as ever the timing of such an event is the million dollar question.
Credit Crunch Leads To Household Crunch
The reasoning behind my bearish view is the credit crunch is likely to morph into the household crunch because most of the population seems financially tapped out.
Almost every necessity that we buy has shot up in price and if you add this to the personal debt problem here in the UK (and US) I think that the average citizen must be in trouble. Well, perhaps not all are in financial trouble but the days of throwing money around and racking up our huge amounts on credit cards must be over.
So if the general population is struggling with their personal budgets just where is the profit growth going to come from? And if there's no general rise in UK PLC profits the stockmarket is going to find it hard to move higher.
8% - 12% Seems The Maximum Possible Rise In 2008
The FTSE 100 closed at 6425 at the end of 2007 so right now we're down about 5%. The question to ask though is that IF the market were to rise in 2008 how much would that rise likely be?
I would say a gain of between 8%-12% is the maximum. Yes, strange moves can always happen in the markets but in the current economic climate I think that England have more of a chance of winning the European Football Championship in Austria/Switzerland this summer (and they're not even in the competition) than the stockmarket rising by more than 12%.
Beware The Old FTSE 100 Highs of 6740
However, if the market is to rise in 2008 then I think 5% is a far more sensible figure. This is because +5% from the 2007 close of 6425 puts prices bang up against the 5 year bull market high (beginning in 2003) of around 6740 (summer of 2007) and such an important level has to be odds-on for major resistance.
Normally what will happen around these major levels is prices push and then rebound, push and then rebound without going anywhere over a 2-3 monthly period. The diagram below illustrates this.